You dedicated hours with your IEP team to review evaluation results, identify needs, set goals, define accommodations, and determine placement. Everyone is on the same page, and the school has begun implementing the IEP effectively.
But is it working?
Special education relies heavily on data. Evaluation results help us identify needs, establish present levels, and create S.M.A.R.T. IEP goals—Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Time-bound.
Progress reports are essential to determine if a student is on track to meet their goals.
For reports to be effective and useful, they must include specific, measurable data.
But what is your child's progress report really telling you?
Your child's IEP should specify how often you will receive progress reports. While these often align with the school’s grading periods, they don’t have to. It’s common for progress reports to be issued quarterly.
Sometimes, reports may be given directly to your child or placed in their backpack, assuming they will pass it on to you. Unfortunately, these don’t always make it home. They might also be emailed directly to you by your case manager or sent via traditional mail.
If you haven’t received a progress report when you expected it, don’t hesitate to contact your case manager and request a copy.
Regardless of whether your child has one goal or a dozen goals in their IEP, teachers are required to report progress for each individual goal. If there are benchmarks or objectives associated with a goal, those should also be included in the report.
When you receive the progress report, take a moment to ensure that all goals and their components are accounted for.
Often, reports indicate that a student is “making progress” or “on track,” which sounds encouraging but lacks detail. To assess true progress, consider asking:
• What percentage of success did the student achieve before the goal was set?
• What is their current percentage?
• What were the results of each trial?
• When and who conducted these trials?
• What content was provided, and which tools were used?
• Is this progress likely to lead to goal mastery by the deadline?
• If not, what adjustments does the district recommend?
“Sally will add double digit whole numbers with 80% accuracy, in 4 out of 5 trials, as measured by curriculum-based assessments, by 6/1/25. Her baseline for this goal is 56% accuracy.”
This goal is well-written—specific, measurable, attainable and time-bound. We assume it is also relevant to Sally's unique needs. However, understanding Sally's progress on this goal requires careful examination of the progress report.
Let’s break it down by looking at some examples of progress reporting:
“Sally is making good progress on this goal. She is working hard, enjoys math, and is expected to meet this goal by year-end.”
Not useful.
While positive, this feedback is anecdotal. There is no data.
What is Sally’s current success percentage? Has she completed at least 5 assessments this period? How did she perform on each, and is this an improvement from her baseline?
It's nice to hear encouraging comments from our teachers! But it is not adequate progress reporting.
“Sally’s mastery has increased from 56% to 65% this period. At this rate, she should reach 80% mastery by year-end.”
Better.
This tells us current accuracy and shows progress from her baseline. However, it still lacks detailed data. Many important points have been omitted, and we will still struggle to really understand what Sally has accomplished on this goal.
“Sally’s average accuracy this period was 65%. This is an increase from her established baseline of 56%. Assessments were given by Ms. Resource Teacher on 9/8 (65%), 9/15 (60%), 9/22 (72%), 9/29 (58%), and 10/6 (70%). Copies of these assessments are attached. Given this rate of progress, I expect Sally to master this goal by 6/1/25.”
This is great reporting!
The data provided is clear, specific and measurable. We know exactly what level of performance Sally is achieving now vs. where she started. We clearly see how and when her performance was measured, by whom, and what tool was used to measure it. The teacher has provided copies of the exact data that was collected, which allows us to check that she was in fact asked to demonstrate the skill being measured. We can also see if there are any trends or details in those assessments that would help refine the support she is receiving.
If your child’s progress reports lack clarity or detail, request additional information from your team or an IEP meeting to discuss their progress.
Under IDEA, schools must ensure meaningful progress in light of a student’s unique circumstances. If their reports don’t clearly demonstrate progress, and your school is not addressing it in the IEP, your child may not be receiving FAPE.
If you need help understanding your child’s progress or want support in communicating with the school about your concerns and requests, SSEA can help. Please reach out today!
Copyright © 2024 Sierra Special Education Advocacy - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.